Dress: Fever via eBay. Cardi: Oasis. Shoes: Faith via eBay. Necklace: made by me
My final day of Dress Your Best week, and I must admit I’m actually quite relieved. It’s been an interesting exercise, but it’s fair to say that singing the praises of aspects of my body has about the same level of comfort for me as one feels when told ‘tell us about yourself’ by a stern-looking panel of five interviewers, one of whom has been frowning disapprovingly at you since you walked through the door (Yes, I have been there. No, I don’t know what it was about my door-0pening procedure that was so offensive.).
I know, really, that that’s the point of it – that we don’t hear or participate in enough body-positive messages. But it’s still completely out of my (sorry) comfort zone to single out bits of myself for active praise rather than simply existing as comfortable in my skin.
Anyway, onto today’s Featured Body Part. Can you tell what it is yet? Here’s a close-up:

My parents and brother are pale-eyed. My sister’s eyes are darker, of similar depth to mine but more of a deep greenish grey, without the hazel accents. She gets them from my father’s side of the family.
As for mine, there are obviously greeny shades in various places in the family tree, since my sister’s grey is deeper than Dad’s and tinged with green, but the hazel? We’ll never know. Mum thinks she remembers her grandmother having eyes this colour, but since there are no colour photographs of the lady in question or anyone of her generation on either side of the family, we can’t really be sure. So I have mystery eyes.
They’re not clear and bright, zingingly striking like blue or clear green eyes. They’re mid-toned and kind of murky, the hazel and green blending gently into one another, and they can colourshift further towards green if I cry or, when that was the fashion and I was young enough and surrounded by women enough to play around with it, wear lilac eyeshadow.
And I rather like that.
Eyes are fragile things, though. Mine are a little short-sighted – nothing major, but enough to have been wearing contact lenses since my late teens (another thing which points to these being eyes inherited from the distaff side, incidentally). And since the hobbies that I love – the reading, the sewing, the knitting, the film-watching, the spinning – all depend heavily on vision I hope that’s the biggest problem I ever have with them.
But it might not be. It’s unlikely, I hope, that I’ll follow suit if I have my mother’s eyes, but there’s no telling how these things play out and my 70-something father was diagnosed with macular degeneration some time ago. Its progress was frighteningly swift. Within the space of a year he went from normal long-sightedness to being legally blind. He can see, but he can’t make out the faces of his loved ones if they sit a metre or two away from him and he can only really read headlines.
As well as having to adjust to audiobooks and discover a love of music to replace the now-lost hobby of reading, he has had to adjust to being an artist whose eyesight is dramatically reduced. And you know what? He’s done it. He is still painting. I can see the differences between his current works and his older ones, but I can also see that he hasn’t compromised his style. As I said on Father’s Day, an artist may lose his eyesight but he’ll never lose his vision.
I can only hope that if these muddy-looking eyes of mine render my vision muddy too I’ll embrace it with half as awesome an attitude.
–
More about macular degeneration, from an organisation that’s less well known than it should be and yet has been extraordinary supportive of, and helpful to, my father: www.maculardisease.org.
