Tag Archives: navy beignet skirt

Still here in this quiet room, deep in delusion sending me over

 Cardi: Gap. Top: Monsoon. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: thrifted. Necklace:made by me

I have a second Beignet skirt cut out, in a slightly lighter and more fluid fabric than this (and a smaller size than this was originally cut in – I had to enlarge the seams and fudge a little on this version and I’ve shrunk a little more since then) that I really ought to put together.

Thing is, this is flawed and fudged and not made from the most sensible choice of fabrics, but… it’s the only non-wool pencil skirt I have that doesn’t gape wildly at the waist. And since making it, I’ve become incredibly picky about that because not only does the gaping waist look far less flattering it also feels less comfortable. Self-made and vintage it is, then, I guess!

I’m playing parts upon the silver screen. I’m anything my dream needs me to be.

Blouse: Miss Selfridge via eBay. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: thrifted. Necklace: made by me

Gloriously laid back weekend, to say it involved hotfooting it to London for Derren Brown-watching purposes. The Svengali show was excellent (though personally I think Enigma just had the edge), but a) none of us made it up on stage and b) I’m not telling you anything about it other than that it was funny and fabulous. Spoilers, sweeties!

Saturday involved a leisurely, but rather soggy, wander around a few of the touristy bits of London before heading for home again, which gave us the opportunity to see an extraordinary number of people moving in not-long-off-the-coach sized groups sporting clearly-purchased-that-morning tourist-attraction-branded rain ponchos. Some of them over shorts that would have been completely appropriate in the previous day’s gloriously warm sunshine, the poor souls.

Welcome to England, people – I’m afraid you have to pack so that once here you can dress for sun, wind, rain, hot and cold! Possibly all on the same day. Layers, shades and brolly with you at all times is a good plan to follow. Now you know why we talk about the weather so much!

Another promise, another scene

 Blouse: New Look via eBay. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: thrifted. Necklace: made by me.

Day Three of Dress Your Best week, and I must admit that I’m finding it quite a challenge. It’s not that there’s nothing about myself that I like, it’s that I’m completely unused to, well, saying so. It’s perfectly acceptable to dislike bits of yourself, and it’s fairly acceptable to ‘quite like’ at least a few bits. But actual appreciaton? That’s coming a little harder for me. It’s terribly alien. But, I deserve a little lovin’, so ladies and gentlemen, today, I praise my pins!

I have shorter skirts in my wardrobe. I’ve even worn one or two for work. But this high-waisted number works brilliantly with a sheer blouse to create a monochrome background for The Red Patent Heels. And actually, it’s not high-waisted on me – my waist is where the belt is. Yes, I am short waisted.

My daily yoga practice teaches me that my hamstrings are a little tight (one day, I’ll keep my feet flat in Downward-facing Dog. One day.). There’s a stretch mark or two on my thighs. There are old scars there somewhere. They end in feet with spindly toes, second toe longer than the big toe, instead of dainty digits. They’re a shade or two lighter than my arms, this time of year. My knees are a little on the knobbly side, and since I inherited ‘em from my father I sincerely hope I do enough exercise to make the prospect of knee replacement surgery recede at least a little further away than my 70s.

But they are long, they are toned, they are shapely, they are strong, and they are flexible. I could fold them under me in yoga poses before I even started doing yoga (The first I’d ever thought about it was when a friend wandered into my room at university and exclaimed ‘oh, you do yoga too?’ when she saw me lying on my back and reading a book with my legs bent under me at the knee. I didn’t. Mind you, I was 18 and not 33 then!). I used to be a fairly decent runner – although I confess I’ve never actually enjoyed running.

These pins have carried me through life with a fair degree of efficiency so far, and now that I’ve established more of an exercise routine than I’ve ever had before they’re supporting me through that, helping me to increase gradually the strength of my upper body (It needs it – but those Downward-Facing Dogs in which I can’t get my feet flat? They help. And I don’t find chatarunga impossible any more.) and feel fitter, healthier and happier than I have in years.

And Red Patent Heels always help ;)

It’s an omen…

 Cardigan: thrifted. Top: White Stuff. Skirt: Beignet, made by me Shoes: Faith via eBay. Necklace: made by me

Do you do the music thing when you’re working? I didn’t used to – largely because I’ve not always worked in environments in which it would be approved of, but it’s rare these days that I don’t have something on at least in the background.

I don’t work in the noisiest of offices, but I do have to do a lot of writing and music’s always been helpful for that. Something about the way it displaces me, takes me just a little outside of where my body is makes it easier to get into the world of putting one word after the other for as good an effect as I can muster.

Music and, for some reason, the eternal author cliche that is coffee shops – I had to stop doing the latter as although I was getting loads of writing done I was spending a fortune on coffee and raspberry and white chocolate muffins!

I do miss the fiction writing, though. I like the writing I do for work, I love the writing I do for this blog, but there’s something about crafting a story, generating feelings and sensations in the reader that I need to revisit.

Anyone fancy bringing me some muffins and a latte?

Yes, Prime Minister

 Cardi: White Stuff. Top: thrifted. Skirt: Beignet – made by me. Shoes: Thrifted. Scarf as belt: thrifted

If there’s one thing I always find appealing, it’s an articulate person.

I don’t, in spite of me being a grammar geek, copywriting, driven-to-distraction-at-times proof-reading bookworm, mean someone who can compose perfectly spelt and exquisite sonnets. I mean someone who can convey their ideas effectively and in a manner which captures my interest. Make me laugh, intrigue me, challenge my thinking and I’m sold. I don’t care about your spelling or whether your pronunciation is correct if I’m enjoying the conversation.

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy well-crafted prose. Revel in it, even. Enjoy crafting it myself. But it doesn’t all have to be metaphors delivered in perfect iambic pentameter or carried through paragraphs and paragraphs of achingly beautiful prose. I enjoy people who can speak fluently and beautifully and creatively in person – and wish I didn’t tip over my own trongue quite so much.

But bluntness has its purpose, too. It may make for a beautiful literary experience to describe a scene in hundreds of words arranged in undulating waves of elegant prose, but beauty isn’t always what’s called for.  Staccato sentences set a scene swiftly. Crudeness can cut through the crap. Humour can gift wrap truths that might otherwise be too stark to deliver.

And people know this instinctively. The people with whom we tend to get impatient aren’t the ones who slap their message on the table without ten minutes of preamble, but nor are they the ones that spend twenty minutes fluently explaining in accurate detail. The people with whom we get impatient are the ones who obscure their own message – the ones who bury their meaning in so much flannel that we’re no longer quite sure what it was, and the ones who give so little to go on that we have to ask a series of questions to tease out meaning.

A bit of Sir Humphrey Appleby to make the point:

“If I am pressed for a straight answer I shall say that, as far as we can see, looking at it by and large, taking one thing with another, in terms of the average of departments, then in the last analysis it is probably true to say that, at the end of the day, you would find, in general terms that, not to put too fine a point on it, there really was not very much in it one way or the other.”

Sisterhood

 Top: Marks and Spencer, thrifted. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: thrifted.

 I know that certain sections of the media would like us to believe that women are catty, always at one another’s throats, always bitching about other women and so on… but in my world, in my life, that’s just not been true.

The best bosses I’ve ever had have been women. The closest friends I have are the most amazing, incredible women who know me better than anyone and are wise, kind, funny and supportive of one another no matter what.

And the communities that I’ve found online, again, mostly full of women, have been inspiring, hilarious, supportive, kind, generous, wise and thoughtful.

I’ve encountered a bad apple or two along the way, but I wouldn’t be without the incredible understanding and acceptance and kindness of the women I know. However I know them, and whether or not I’ve even met them.

Ladies, I salute you!

Roots of discussion

 Cardi: Gap. Top: Monsoon. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: Faith via ebay. Necklace: made by me

Lately, I’ve been craving stimulation. Minds out of the gutter, people (yes, former schoolfriends, I mean you, you fabulously filthy bunch :P ) – I mean stimulation of the intellectual variety. Work, at the moment, is fine but going through a relatively routine phase, and I’ve been missing the exploration of ideas that keeps the synapses firing.

Me being me, the solution to that has been to buzzsaw my way through several literary classics (I have mysteriously – ahahaha – resisted the lure of re-reading Ulysses. Can’t think how.) and roam the internet following every faintly interesting lead that crosses my path. Imagine my delight when the two intersected and literature turned up during a discussion on a feminist board of particular sorts of male seduction technique!

Good discussion is what I was raised on. We’re a family that does serious discussion and then pokes trains of thought off the rails (one of these days, my brother and I really should invent the Subway food delivery system we envisaged) and into hilarity.

I’m some years younger than my brother and sister, too, so they were both away at University while I was in my early-mid teens. Weekend mornings? Mum had her much-needed lie-in. I’m larkish like my dad, so I’d get up, make a couple of cups of tea, go find him (more often than not, he’d be either making something or painting), and then we’d chat about the issues of the day over tea or crumble-making. Those weekend mornings are some of my fondest memories.

My parents purposely never told me how they voted or what, if any, their religious beliefs were, not until I was well into adulthood. But they discussed topical issues back to front and upside down and from every conceivable angle and encouraged in their children a thirst for knowledge, a sense of perspective regarding our own positions relative to those of others, and a sense of the importance of politics and of damn well using the vote we’re given.

They advocated religious tolerance – and raised at least one daughter who arrived at her agnosticism by dint of reading the Bible (Yes, all of it – though I confess I probably skipped a few of those begats. Yes, I was an odd kid.), the Bhagavad Gita, countless texts on various forms of pagan spirituality (I think I still have some tarot cards somewhere – the psychology behind the use of those is rather fascinating), a shedload about inevitable Other Main Religions (CofE school, Christianity was the default, sort of, though I remember RE lessons being a question of approaching various ethical issues from the perspective of various different religions) and goodness knows what else. Lot of reading to come to the conclusion that We Can’t Possibly Know, eh?

Knowledge acquisition has always been key for me (And oh, how I hate those people who act as though they’re terribly special for having a piece of knowledge someone else doesn’t have! Different strokes, people, different strokes.), and alongside the devouring of every written source on which I can lay my hands, thoughtful discussion has always been a favourite way of having my ideas expanded and my thoughts challenged in unexpected ways. If I’m not getting that brain workout at work? Well, no wonder I’m so at home on the interwebs. Other people’s perspectives, even the ones with which I violently disagree, are always fascinating.

All together now: we are all real

Blouse: thrifted. Skirt: Beignet, made by me. Shoes: thrifted. Necklace: Monsoon

Time for an update of an article I wrote a while ago, which is, sadly, still relevant because the ‘real woman’ thing seems to show no signs of Going The Fuck Away. The more time I spend within the style blogging community, the more I wish the diversity it demonstrates was reflective of the wider media.

Here we go again. There’s a photograph online of a slightly-larger-than-is-typical model and out come the comments. You know the ones I mean – they appear almost every time a larger model is brought to people’s attention. ‘It’s nice to see a real woman for a change’ ‘Finally! A real woman, not one of those stick insects’ ‘Yay, she has curves, like a real woman’.

Ugh. Can we please stop this? Whether we’re tall or short, slender or larger, black or white, with disabilities or without, flat-chested or large-breasted, or anything in between and any combination of those things, none of us is made from spacedust and marzipan. We are all real. There is not one single Approved Female Body Type from which only the unworthy deviate. That 5’11″ slender soul gliding along the catwalk? She’s as real and as much of a woman as you, me, and Marilyn Monroe. Is she representative of the whole of womankind? Well no, no more so than you or I. But not being everywoman (and who can be that?) doesn’t make her less of a woman.

At 5’4″ and a UK size 12, I’m never going to have a typical model look, so you’d think that I’ve no vested interest, that it doesn’t wound me when someone with a very slender body is dismissed with a ‘someone feed her a sandwich’. It does wound me, though. I’d argue that it wounds you too, whatever your shape, height and size.

It is highly desirable for women of all shapes and sizes to have greater prominence in the media, I think we can all agree on that. But we should be calling for exactly that, not slapping down the slender-framed while the curvier among us try to get a foothold. ‘Fat cow’ might be a horrible thing to call someone, but so is ‘stick insect’. It’s no less hurtful to tell a slim woman she’d be better if she put on weight than it is to tell an overweight woman that she’d be better if she lost some.

And why on earth do we think it’s our business anyway?

Women’s bodies, often the honed and toned bodies of models and actresses whose trade is in their looks (and that’s a frankly depressing state of affairs that could be the subject of a whole different article), are everywhere for our consumption. We are encouraged to pick them apart, to make comparisons: between us and them, between them-at-the-oscars and them-nipping-out-for-a-pint-of-milk, between any one of them at various weights, between two arbitrarily selected women who happened to have a similar dress on, and so on. Women’s bodies are under so much scrutiny in the media that it’s no wonder we often place our own under a microscope and find it wanting. But it hurts all of us to buy into this rather than fight against it. We’re none of us here for anyone else’s entertainment, and we all have differences which should be celebrated and not sloughed, sliced or siphoned away.

Frankly, how dare one person suggest that another is not a proper woman, just because hers is a different sort of beauty? How dare we think it’s acceptable to insult the attractiveness of someone just because they don’t look like us? It’s a cliche, but the more you really look at the women in your life the more you realise it’s true: we are all beautiful. It’s no single woman’s fault that her body type or colour or hair is being held up to us as a standard, and we shouldn’t pillory anyone for fitting that ideal, any more that we should pillory those who are the opposite of that ideal. Let’s face it, larger ladies don’t seem to get any better a deal than their svelte sisters. If you’ll pardon the pun, there’s a really narrow field of ‘acceptable’ when it comes to typical ideas of women’s bodies and that hurts all of us.

It’s taken me most of my 33 years and an awful lot of tears and soul-searching to realise that I, too, am an attractive woman (and I’ve typed and deleted that 8 times so far, it feels so alien to dare to say), wobbly stomach and fluctuating weight and all. I never did achieve Cindy Crawford’s amazingly toned stomach and arms, and my legs didn’t magically grow several by several inches, but I’m decent looking, and I’m neither more nor less real than she is. The idea that many pre-teen girls of today will be just the same as I was if we, their older sisters, mothers and mentors, don’t do something about it is frankly appalling.

So the next time you come across one of those comments about ‘real women’, then unless it clearly means only ‘not airbrushed into plasticism’ (that’s another whole different article…), do real women of all shapes and sizes a favour.

Call them out on it. Get them to stop and think.

Remind them:

We Are All Real